|
From: "Washington Kurdish Institute"
07/18/01
1. Ghassemlou Remembered on Anniversary of Assassination
(PDKI) 7/13
2. Rural Girls Deprived of Education
(PDKI) 6/23
Commemorating
Dr. Ghassemlou's Martyrdom and the Loss of Kak Salam Azizi
July 13, 2001
Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI)
Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI) in the
period of its 56 years of struggling history has left behind many
vulnerable stages. Hard and difficult struggle filled with strained
circumstances, heaped up with sudden events and unpleasant tragedies.
In the past, the despotism of monarchy, and in this period the reactionary
regime of Islamic Republic's oppression have continuously been waging
on our Party as a disturbing nightmare. These regimes have not withheld
from any inhumane plans and actions for the elimination of our Party
leadership, surrendering its members, and to put an end to its political
and organizational history.
Qazi Mohammad who was the founder, and the leader of PDKI, and
the establisher of the Kurdistan Republic was hanged on March 30,
1947 on the order of Mohammad Reza Shah, only with the offense
that he had lived for the> Kurds, and had been in the service
of his national aspirations. No doubt, the unpleasant tragedy of
July 13, 1989 too was not only painful that it will never vanish
from the memory of the Kurds, but it also afflicted and touched
upon the hearts of democratic liberation activists, and defendants
of human rights globally.
It was in this day, that Dr. Ghassemlou, the Secretary-general
of our Party, and Abdullah Ghaderi-Azar, member of the Central Committee
and the official representative of the Party in Europe, were assassinated
in the city of Vienna by> the terrorists of Islamic Republic.
A plan that the regime's mercenaries had drafted in the name of
negotiation ended with the assassination of Dr. Ghassemlou and his
comrades. Regime's authorities had hoped to achieve from this terror
the demise of our Party, the disappointment of the people of Kurdistan
in their just cause that the PDKI had been leading.
Dr. Ghassemlou was a talented and a capable personality
of our Party. Within the organization and the Kurdish community,
he was a popular and a well-respected individual. He was not only
a charismatic leader within the Kurds, but he was also known as
a knowledged individual in diplomacy and a messenger of peace and
dialogue in the world of politics, in international community, and
democratic organizations, and his global fame emanated from these
characteristics.
Ghassemlou's mission to lead PDKI dates back to
1950. When he started to perform this mission, from PDKI had remained
a big name, but a destroyed city. It was because of his leading
role that the political-organizational structure of the Party was
redrawn from the start, and was organized based on a modern platform
that was reflective of the contemporary conditions of struggle,
and a developed programme and charter for the Party was proposed.
After these changes, absolutism was abolished in the Party forever;
internal democracy flourished; meetings, conferences and conventions
took place; the leadership of the Party was elected from these conferences
and conventions; collective cooperative activities proliferated;
the principle of criticism --aimed at eliminating shortages and
solving difficulties-- and development was given top priority; education
and training of members with organizational courage, and struggle
in the direction of raising their level of political-organizational
knowledge spread, and organization became the mot important weapon
of political activeness.
The thesis of living Ghassemlou on healthy internal
relations were blended with mutual understanding and friendship;
not only the borders between accountability and friendship did not
fall and were not disrupted, but also each on its own place was
respected. The circumstances were changed in a way that the member
of the Party from the top of the pyramid to its bases, transformed
to the members of a family. The effects of such changes on the members
were so drastic that they considered the Party theirs, and were
extremely active in preserving their Party personality.
Dr. Ghassemlou theorized the Party's relations with the Kurdish
organizations and parties in a way that the layout of these relations
should be analyzed as a historical necessity, and established on
the basis of mutual respect and non-intervention in each other's
affairs, and most importantly no Kurdish organization should allow
itself to establish regional and international relations with countries
on behalf of another organization.
Ghassemlou believed in the unity of the Kurdish nation. It was
from this perspective that he published "Kurdistan and Kurds".
However, his world understanding of the Kurdish issues was very
realistic. He had felt all the obstacles> that had been created
by the sensitive geographical location of Kurdistan. He would critically
analyze the level of capability and power of the international forces
in the Middle East region. In this analysis it was important that
between "national interest" and "political consideration",
he had chosen " the possible". This thesis was followed
by the synthesis slogan of "Democracy for Iran, Autonomy for
Kurdistan", a slogan that has still remained as the strategic
slogan of the Party, and has gathered members and sympathizers under
its umbrella.
Ghassemlou observed a special dialectical relationship between
"national democracy" and "regional autonomy",
and identified a precise and logical relationship method that the
Party developed with national Iranian organizations. These relations
were rooted on the basis of finding common grounds and mutual respect,
and the avoidance of any emerging hegemonic force. Those segment
of organizations and national parties that respected democracy and
the rights of oppressed nationalities of Iran were placed on the
front ranks of the organizations that the Party should establish
relations with, and it was meant that these relations should be
strategic and long-term. PDKI in this respect also attained many
important achievements. Its prestige increased day by day among
the popular masses of Iran and other democratic political personalities
and nation-wide organizations. The political-organizational capability
and credit of the Party in regards to the destiny of Iranian political
alternative has reached a scale that any national or united democratic
or progressive front in Iran without the cooperation or participation
of PDKI is considered weak and incomplete.
Ghassemlou's thesis in regards to the presence of
the Party in international gatherings and communities was also
very effective and decisive. Previously, if there existed any relationships
between our Party and the international groups and organizations,
it was not reflective of our Party's resistance circumstances and
conditions. It was Ghassemlou who with experience and awareness
of the culture and politics of Eastern and Western European countries,
cleverly and masterly strived on these matters and experimented
many ways, and showed to the world a real image of a democrat; it
reached a stage that now mainly as a result of his non-top struggle,
PDKI has been admitted to the ranks of Socialist International as
a member to carry across the just demands of the Kurds in Iranian
Kurdistan to the world via this universal tribune.
Ghassemlou had dedicated the last 20 years of his life serving
Party objectives. He was himself a school of humanity, national
sentiment, and performance of Party affairs. The change that he
brought into the Party organism was so effective, dynamic, and appropriate
that after his martyrdom left behind a strong, firm Democratic Party
with many experiences. The precious lessons and advices that the
companions of Democrat had learned from the school of Ghassemlou,
had brought them about in a way that they had remained in the stage
of struggle with a firm belief and a courage more than before; by
keeping the ranks of the Party united, they remained faithful to
the path of development, and did not allow the anti-ethnic regime,
the Islamic Republic to carry out its polluted objectives.
As we look into the month of July, and turn the daily
pages of this month, we see that aside from the tragic event of
July 13, 1989, we have also encountered another doleful event in
15 July 1999, and sadness and mourning has hurt the hearts of our
democratic comrades once more. It was the sudden death of our valued
comrade, Sayid Salam Azizi, member of Politburo of the Party. In
this day, his heart stopped due to a sudden illness and this striving
comrade bid farewell with his companions.
Comrade Salam Azizi was a real democrat and one of
the loyal students of Dr. Ghassemlou. He too had dedicated the last
two decades of his life to fight and struggle in the ranks of PDKI.
In the direction of serving his objectives, he left aside his personal
life, abandoned his post and state appointment, and joined the fighting
force of the Party, and as a devoted and a fighting comrade dedicated
all his capabilities and knowledge to perform his Party responsibilities.
Truthfulness, merit, ingeniousness, firmness were some of the eminent
social characteristics of Kak Salam that assisted him in this leadership
role. He was elected as a member of Politburo for 10 years, and
in this important and honourable post carried out his duties. Kak
Salam was a public figure, and an extremely successful family man.
He was very respected by all those who had close contact with him.
Kak Salam was one of the most important assets of the Party and
an energetic PDKI cadre. With his death, PDKI endured a heavy loss
to its organizational structure. It has only been the courage and
the sacrifices of children of Democrat who have been able to compensate
the loss of this comrade and appeased the painful hearts of family
and friends.
In the 12th anniversary of the assassination of Dr.
Ghassemlou, and the 2nd anniversary of the absence of Kak Sayid
Salam Azizi, comrades and co-fighters, along with a authentic and
faithful praising to the spirits of these two live leaders, we renew
our promise with their virtuous souls and the popular masses of
Kurdistan that we remain the continuous followers of their proud
path until the realization of their holy objectives, and the slogan
of "victory or death" will remain as the lighthouse of
our struggle.
Deprivation of Kurdistan's Rural Girls from Pursuing
Their Studies
PDKI (translated from KURDISTAN, Organ of the Central Committee
of PDKI)
June 23, 2001
"Every one has the right to have access to
training and education. Technical training should become public
and high level studies should be available to all equally so every
one can equally enjoy their existance." (1)
The establishment and expansion of educational centers,
and providing its various requirements that gives all the members
of society the opportunity to have access to education is the primary
responsibility of every accountable state. In this case, the disadvantaged
and under-developed regions must become governments' top priorities.
Such an initiative while accommodates the fundamental rights of
a segment of society, it is also a step forward in constructing
growth and developmental basis of society in all dimensions. But
unfortunately, as a result of lack of commitments of government
ruling Kurdistan, in this situation, we currently observe a huge
segment of our society who due to various obstacles has been deprived
from pursuing their studies and developing their talents.
The issue of deprivation of rural girls from continued
schooling has existed in the last two decades, despite the growing
literacy in Kurdish villages, and other deprived areas. The prolongment
of such situation has increased the number of girls deprived from
higher education. It should also be noted that discussing rural
girls does not mean that other groups are in a better condition.
Such analysis, on one hand, is the indication of the existance of
several layers of oppression that rural girls are trapped in, and
on the other, the important impact that increasing rural girls literacy
level will have in changing current public relations, growth and
development in society. In analyzing the condition of continuing
studies of these girls, we find several obstacles that are related
and work together to create such a deprivation for rural girls:
Lack of necessary attention from authorities and
their economic planners in the growth of educational center networks,
particularly in providing accommodation for upper studies (secondary
and post-secondary education) in rural areas, despite the fact that
every year the majority of students in rural areas finish their
elementary school, has resulted in the deprivation of a notable
segment of society, especially girls in senior elementary and secondary
school. Of course, in this case not all the girls are in the same
situation; despite the fact that senior elementary schools have
been created in some rural areas, many of these female students
face such problems after finishing basic elementary school. A research
done in one of the Kurdish provinces is a good support for such
claims: "From girls in Kurdistan province only 23 773 were
active in senior elementary that were mostly from urban areas. In
school year 1997, for the first time one 24-hours female high school
with the capacity of 124 students in one of the rural areas of the
province was established". (2)
If shortage or lack of educational and training
facilities is one of the obstacles ahead of many girls going beyond
their elementary studies, there are also other reasons that in many
cases work side by side to create the current situation: traditional,
religious thinking of many rural families in regards to the issue
of literacy of girls in general, and going beyond elementary in
particular, and lack of girls independence (and women in general)
along with material impoverishment, and country's economic crisis
are also the reasons for rural girls early drop-out. It is the results
of such realities that the average of female literacy level in rural
areas is at its lowest (4 years). But if the illiterate girls of
rural areas are put into the equation, there we find even a more
disturbing result.
As it is evident, rural girls lack of access of necessary education
and training has resulted in destructive consequences for them and
society in general. In such conditions, we will constantly observe
the repeated and renewed oppression and deprivation on one hand,
and under-development of huge segment f our society's population
on the other. They cannot develop their talents and creativity
due to shortage of scientific and technical knowledge and training,
and at the end, they will be unable to change political climate
in unequal conditions that have been mounted on them by family and
society. Consequently, they will be unable to obtain their individual
rights and freedom as their ancestors. This situation will result
in continuing under-development of rural areas and society in general
in cultural, economic and social aspects.
Here, we can conclude that oppression and deprivation that is used
in regards to the rural girls of Kurdistan, aside from being an
subjugation directly against them, it is an oppression against the
Iranian Kurdish society in general. For ending such and creating
conditions that they can obtain their human rights and become an
active force in the service of development and growth of Kurdish
society, educational networks in deprived areas need to be expanded
as soon as possible, and rural girls should acquire necessary material
and moral facilities for continuing their studies. The unfavourable
conditions that they are situated in must be identified and known,
and attempts must be made to increase the level of rural families
knowledge considering the importance of education in general and
for girls as an important segment of society in particular.
One last point that the deprivation of rural girls
from their most basic rights in this age that other societies have
obtained astonishing achievements and wonderful developments, is
a sorrow reality that has become the characteristics and an indication
of under-development in our society. Of course this is an indication
of situation filled with oppression and tyrannical ruling that the
enemies of Kurds and Kurdistan have been the main cause of such
a tragedy. Maybe the day of its extinction will come in the victory
and the Kurdish peoples' attainment of their legitimate rights and
demands (freedom,democracy, and ethnic rights).
Sources:
(1) A selection from Article 26, part 1 of Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and Article 13 of UN Convention on Economic,
social, and cultural.
(2) "Women in Iran''s Labour Market",
page 253
Washington Kurdish Institute
605 G Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20024
202-484-0140 (tel)
202-484-0142 (fax)
www.kurd.org/kurd
|
|